Visibility.
As soon as upon a time, that phrase was the commonest reply I heard once I requested advertising leaders what was incorrect with their content material operations. “We’ve got restricted visibility into what content material is deliberate and produced and the way efficient it’s,” they’d say.
One CMO of a Fortune 1000 firm even admitted she realized concerning the firm’s thought management by subscribing to the publication. “I do not know what they’re planning,” she stated.
During the last two years, that phrase has light.
Generative AI stormed into our vocabularies, commoditizing content material creation. Pace and amount are the brand new watchwords, and senior leaders appear to have resigned themselves to content material wastage as the price of doing enterprise.
“Visibility? Meh. Why fear about it after we’re producing so shortly? What’s the worst that may occur? It gained’t get used?”
Nicely, sure. And that’s exactly the issue. I discuss it and the options on this video. Hold studying for much more element.
The identical logic has been utilized to digital advert spend. Regardless of estimates that 22% of all advert budgets are misplaced to fraud, solely 23% of selling leaders in a 2023 survey described fraud as a priority, with 14% saying they had been “unconcerned.”
Now, we’re sleepwalking into the identical room with content material technique — or, extra exactly, the dearth of 1. Forrester estimates that 65% of customer-oriented content material goes unused attributable to points with findability, relevance, or high quality.
Let’s do some fast math: If entrepreneurs recovered even half of that wasted content material, do you suppose total advertising outcomes would possibly enhance?
The messy content material machine
Take into account how uncooked concepts develop into advertising messages, thought management, articles, and campaigns. That course of — now supercharged (or muddled) by generative AI — often begins with somebody creating or curating the “proper” inputs to feed the content material machine.
Leaders might set up the themes, however these quickly get distorted by siloed groups utilizing instruments that promise effectivity however ship chaos.
Right here’s the irony: AI was alleged to make this simpler.
Spoiler: It doesn’t.
AI amplifies the mess. Concepts are invisible till they’re reworked into content material. And with out visibility, companies fall into the identical lure: Content material is everyone’s job however no person’s technique.
Frontline groups use AI to pump out hyper-specific content material for rapid wants. In the meantime, central groups battle to handle the tidal wave of content material or hesitate to belief all of it — as a result of they don’t have any visibility into what was generated by AI versus what was crafted by people.
Think about working an car meeting line. The typical automobile has 30,000 elements assembled alongside a line about 1,000 ft lengthy.
Now, think about you solely have visibility into the final 50 ft. You’d do not know what number of vehicles are coming, which fashions, and whether or not somebody swapped out a key half.
That’s what many organizations’ content material operations appear like at present: no visibility, no alignment, and no management.
The concern consider content material collaboration
On the coronary heart of this visibility disaster lies a deeper, usually ignored situation: a concern of collaboration.
I’ve seen this concern rising over the previous couple of years — particularly in environments the place manufacturing velocity is the precedence. Collaboration is commonly perceived as a bottleneck, requiring extra time for a number of voices to be heard, consensus to be constructed, and conflicts to be resolved. Put merely: The main target shifted from “crafting with intention” to “publishing for the sake of velocity.”
AI has solely added to this problem, amplifying the stress between velocity and significant collaboration. Let’s unpack this additional:
Concern of dropping management (to the machine)
A worldwide enterprise I labored with has been attempting to make use of AI to churn out huge portions of Website positioning-oriented content material. However regional groups usually discover it tone-deaf and irrelevant. Management resists collaborating with regional groups to enhance relevance, fearing it might “pollute” the AI’s coaching knowledge or sluggish manufacturing. The end result? AI content material that’s quick however more and more ineffective.
Concern of an excessive amount of course of
At one SaaS firm, the CEO proudly claimed, “GenAI will exchange midlevel workers quickly.” They’ve applied AI instruments for all the pieces — content material creation, analytics, publishing schedules, and so forth. However and not using a collaborative framework, the instruments have develop into distractions. Groups generate extra content material, nevertheless it lacks strategic alignment. The end result? Algorithmic litter.
(This example jogs my memory of actor and director Ben Affleck’s remark about AI and artwork: “AI is a craftsman at finest … craftsman is figuring out the best way to work. Artwork is figuring out when to cease.”)
Concern of failure (within the AI highlight)
I do know of a midsize consultancy that has deployed AI instruments to centralize content material advertising creation. However I additionally know that particular person practitioners concern that the shared system will expose their work as much less polished. So that they’ve tried to make use of their very own fashions. As a substitute of fostering collaboration, AI bolstered silos. The end result? Missed alternatives and a extra difficult case for future AI investments.
Generative AI will carry out significantly better in environments with exact inputs, processes, and collaboration.
Logistics presents an ideal analogy: AI optimizes provide chains when it has full visibility into uncooked supplies, manufacturing levels, and supply timelines. Your content material “provide chain” is not any completely different.
Embrace the AI-powered mess
Right here’s the uncomfortable reality: AI doesn’t remove our content material mess — it amplifies it.
Regional groups will nonetheless create their very own content material. Topic-matter consultants will nonetheless add slide decks that don’t align with technique. AI will nonetheless generate headlines that sound correct however miss the purpose.
And that’s OK — so long as there’s a mechanism to make the mess seen to the people who must make the content material imply one thing.
Consider your content material technique and the visibility it supplies as air visitors management. You don’t dictate each takeoff or touchdown. However you do must know what’s within the air, what’s able to launch, and what’s grounded.
Generative AI isn’t going away — it’s solely changing into extra central to content material creation. Step one to thriving on this new period is reclaiming visibility.
Right here’s the best way to begin:
Map your content material provide chain: Determine each stage of content material creation, together with the place AI contributes.
Take a look at and select collaborative instruments: Prioritize instruments that improve visibility and teamwork, not simply automation.
Construct a tradition of partnership: Embrace AI as a instrument that works with the people in your group and their position within the course of, not rather than them.
Decelerate to hurry up: Generally, the best manner ahead is to pause, replicate, and create intentional friction in your content material course of. This pause isn’t about delaying progress — it’s about making certain sharper focus, fostering creativity, and making choices that result in impactful, sustainable momentum.
It’s your story. AI will help you inform it — nevertheless it nonetheless wants you (and a technique) to information it.
HANDPICKED RELATED CONTENT:
Cowl picture by Joseph Kalinowski/Content material Advertising and marketing Institute